getpdf NLM PubMed Logo https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.62.02.24.8308                                  

Antigenotoxic and Life-Prolonging Effects of Flavoured Kombuchas on Drosophila melanogaster

Ayşen Yağmur Burgazlıorcid tiny, Ghada Tagortiorcid tiny, Burçin Yalçınorcid tiny, Merve Güneşorcid tiny, Berfin Eroğluorcid tiny, Eda Delikorcid tiny, Burcu Emine Tefon Öztürkorcid tiny and Bülent Kaya*orcid tiny

Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Akdeniz University, Dumlupınar Boulevard 07058, Antalya, Türkiye

Article history:

Received: 31 July 2023

Accepted: 17 March 2024

cc by

Keywords:

antigenotoxicity; Drosophila melanogaster; kombucha; lifespan

E WEB Goal 03The content of this publication has not been approved by the United Nations and does not reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States.

Summary:

Research background. Kombucha is a fermented beverage with several health benefits; however, to improve its antioxidant activity, new raw materials such as hop, madimak and hawthorn were included in the present study.

Experimental approach. The somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was performed on the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) to evaluate the antigenotoxic potential of black tea-flavoured kombucha and three other flavours of kombuchas (hop, madimak and hawthorn) against H2O2- and K2Cr2O7-induced genotoxicity. Furthermore, a lifespan assay was performed to assess the effects of kombuchas on the longevity of the fruit fly.

Results and conclusions. According to the results obtained from the SMART assay, hop-flavoured kombucha attenuated genotoxicity induced by H2O2, and madimak-flavoured kombucha reduced genotoxicity induced by H2O2 and K2Cr2O7. Black tea- and hop-flavoured kombucha prolonged the lifespan of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) after the treatment with  H2O2 and K2Cr2O7.

Novelty and scientific contribution. Hop-flavoured kombucha is a promising antioxidant that protects the genome and extends the lifespan of the fruit fly. This study sheds light on novel beverages that can combat ageing and protect against genotoxicity.

*Corresponding author: +902423102350
  +902422278911
  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

INTRODUCTION

Kombucha is a fermented beverage made by adding sugar to the infusion of black, green or oolong tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves and the inoculum called symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY) (1). The consumption of kombucha began in China around 220 BC and in Japan around 414 AD due to its energising and detoxifying properties (2). Due to its functional properties, kombucha has become one of the most popular fermented beverages with low-alcohol content on the global market (3).

Several compounds including vitamins (e.g. B2, B6, B12 and vitamin C), minerals (e.g. Mn, Fe, Zn, Cu and Ni), acids (e.g. acetic, citric and gluconic acids) and polyphenols, especially catechins, have been identified in kombucha (4). However, the composition of the beverage differs depending on the raw materials and fermentation parameters such as time and speed (5, 6). To enhance the antioxidant potential and antimicrobial activity of kombucha, alternative materials, such as grape juice (7), soy (8) and banana peel (9), have been used.

Humulus lupulus (hop) is a plant from the Cannabeaceae family, native to Europe, Lithuania, Asia and North America, which has been used in traditional medicine to treat anxiety, fever and gastric problems (10, 11). Later, hop was used as a flavouring compound in the brewing industry (12). Hop is rich in flavonoids, including flavonols, flavanones and especially prenylflavonoids (13). Until recently, the antioxidant properties of hops were associated with the prenylflavonoids known as xanthohumol and its derivatives (isoxanthohumol) (14, 15).

Polygonum cognatum (madimak) is a plant member of the Polygonaceae family, a species from Türkiye, that is generally used to treat gingivitis and enhance diuresis (16, 17). Madimak exhibits antioxidant effects given the abundance of coumarin, quercetin, sinapic and salicylic acid (16, 18).

Crataegus monogyna (hawthorn) is a plant from the Rosaceae family, which is native to Europe, northwest Africa and western Asia, and is often used in folk medicine for the treatment of diabetes and asthma. Hawthorn also has antioxidant properties due to its polyphenolic and flavonoid compounds (19-21).

In this study, the antigenotoxic potential of black tea-flavoured kombucha and kombucha with other three flavours (hop, madimak and hawthorn) against hydrogen peroxide and potassium dichromate(VI) was investigated, and their effects on the lifespan of a fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) were evaluated. Drosophila is a promising model organism for studying antigenotoxicity and longevity (22, 23). Drosophila melanogaster has a short life cycle, a rapid reproductive rate and around 77 % of its genetic content encompasses orthologous disease-related genes in humans (24).

The wing SMART assay is an in vivo test to evaluate the genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of several chemicals such as plant extracts, foods and drugs in the somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster (25). Lifespan assay requires large populations and well-maintained animal stocks suitable for short-lived fruit flies (26).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals

The black tea-flavoured kombucha and other three flavours of kombucha (hop, madimak and hawthorn) were obtained from Tefon Öztürk's Laboratory at Akdeniz University (Antalya, Türkiye). The composition of the tested kombuchas and the process of preparation were published in our previous study (27). Hydrogen peroxide and potassium dichromate(VI) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Wing SMART test on Drosophila

Somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) is an in vivo test frequently used to detect point mutations, deletions, non-disjunctions and recombinations (28). The principle of the SMART test on Drosophila is based on the loss of heterozygosity using two strains: flare-3 (flr3/ln (3LR) TM3, BdS) and multiple wing hair (mwh/mwh) (29, 30).

Eggs were collected for eight hours from a standard cross between male (mwh) and female (flr3) flies. Once the collected eggs reached the larval stage, third-instar larvae ((72±4) hours old) were collected and subjected to chronic treatment in vials containing 4.5 g of Drosophila instant medium (Carolina Biological Supply Co., Burlington, NC, USA) soaked in 9 mL of the tested compounds. Distilled water was used as a negative control, whereas H2O2 (0.05 M) and K2Cr2O7 (1 mM) were used as positive controls. The flies were stored in 70 % ethanol at 4 °C until further use. The wings of the adult flies were embedded in Faure’s solution (50 g chloral hydrate, 30 g gum Arabic, 20 mL glycerol and 50 mL distilled water) and mounted on glass slides to evaluate the mutant spots under an optical microscope at 400× magnification. The mutant spots were classified as large single spots (≥2 cells of mwh type or ≥4 cells of flr3 type), small single spots (1−2 cells of mwh type) and twin spots (mwh and flr3 cells) (28). Eighty wings were counted in each treatment group. A chronic exposure (48 h) in three replicates was performed.

The assay of Drosophila lifespan

Each vial contained 50 newly enclosed Oregon R+ strain of Drosophila treated with four different experimental food media (black tea, hop, madimak and hawthorn), with three replicates for each condition. Each type of food medium was mixed with toxic compounds, including 0.05 M H2O2 or 1 mM K2Cr2O7. Distilled water was used as a negative control. The food medium was renewed twice a week and dead flies were counted every 48 h.

Statistical analysis

The SMART was performed using the multiple-decision procedure with the conditional binomial test (31, 32). The probability level (α=β) was set at 0.05. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was done and survival curves were analysed with the log-rank test. The mean value of the 10 % of flies that had the longest lifespan was considered as the maximum lifespan. The statistical significance of the mean value and the maximum lifespan was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s t-test. Cox proportional regression was used to calculate the hazard ratio. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics v. 22.0 (33) and RStudio (v. 2022.07.0+548) (34).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The kombucha preparations obtained after the fermentation process were used without further dilution and applied to the medium for Drosophila. Hydrogen peroxide is a reactive oxygen intermediate produced by physiological processes and/or exposure to xenobiotics. However, excessive production can lead to DNA damage, including single- and double-strand breaks and purine/pyrimidine oxidation (35). Potassium dichromate is a potent genotoxic agent causing chromosomal aberrations, oxidative stress, DNA breaks and lipid peroxidation (36). The frequencies of total mutant spots of H2O2 and K2Cr2O7 used in the present study were significantly higher than that of the negative control (distilled water) (Fig. 1), indicating that both H2O2 and K2Cr2O7 had mutagenic effects. This is consistent with the results of previous studies of Drosophila (37, 38).

Influence of kombucha preparations on frequency of total mutant spots. NC=negative control, BT=black tea, HO=hop, M=madimak, H=hawthorn. *p<0.05 vs distilled water as negative control (conditional binominal test)


Both hop- and hawthorn-flavoured kombucha attenuated H2O2-induced genotoxicity, while madimak-flavoured kombucha reduced K2Cr2O7- and H2O2-induced genotoxicity by decreasing the frequency of total mutant spots compared to positive controls (Fig. 1). Based on our findings from a previous study (27), the tested madimak-flavoured kombucha has a higher chlorogenic acid concentration than hop and hawthorn kombuchas (868.4 vs 103 vs 15.5 mg/mL). Chlorogenic acid may exert antigenotoxic effects by reducing oxidative stress and maintaining enzymatic antioxidant activities (39, 40). No significant change in the frequency of total mutant spots was reported for black tea-flavoured kombucha, which could be due to the absence of protocatechuic acid in its chemical composition compared to flavoured kombucha (27). As reported in a previous study, protocatechuic acid showed an antigenotoxic effect against H2O2 in the wing SMART assay of Drosophila (41). In addition, gallic acid, a well-known antioxidant, was the major compound in hop- and hawthorn-flavoured kombuchas (27).

The effects of various combinations of kombucha (black tea, hop, madimak and hawthorn) alone or supplemented with potentially toxic agents (H2O2 or K2Cr2O7) on the lifespan of the Oregon R+ strain of Drosophila were evaluated.

According to Fig. 2a, black tea, hop and madimak kombucha increased the cumulative survival probability compared to the negative control (distilled water) (log-rank, χ2=440, p<0.0001). However, only the mean value for black tea-flavoured kombucha (36.04 days) statistically significantly increased (8.6 %) compared to the negative control (Fig. 2b). In addition, the hazard ratio was calculated to obtain information about the relative likelihood of the mortality of Drosophila after the exposure to different compounds. Interestingly, the black tea-flavoured kombucha had a promising potential to reduce the mortality by 25 % compared to the negative control (hazard ratio of 0.75) (Fig. 2c).

Effect of kombucha (black tea, hop, madimak and hawthorn) alone on the lifespan parameters in Oregon R+ strain of flies: a) survival curves, b) mean and maximum lifespan±standard error, and c) hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate the level of statistical significance (*p<0.05, ***p<0.001, log-rank test (a), Dunnett’s t-test compared with NC (b), Cox proportional hazards regression (c)). N(fly)=150 for each condition. NC=negative control (distilled water), BT=black tea, HO=hop, M=madimak, H=hawthorn


The greatest increase in cumulative survival probability was observed with black tea-flavoured kombucha supplemented with H2O2 (log-rank, χ2=592, p<0.0001), followed by hop kombucha with H2O2 and madimak kombucha with H2O2 compared to the treatment with H2O2 alone (Fig. 3a). In addition, the mean lifespan of Drosophila supplemented with black tea-flavoured kombucha (36.7 days) increased by 81 % and the maximum lifespan (47.1 days) increased by 32.2 % compared to H2O2 alone (Fig. 3b). The mean lifespan of flies supplemented with hop kombucha (33.1 days) increased by 63.1 % and the mean lifespan of flies supplemented with madimak kombucha (32.9 days) increased by 61.9 % compared to H2O2 alone (p<0.001). The hazard ratio of 0.21, 0.35 and 0.37 for black tea with H2O2, hop with H2O2, and madimak with H2O2, respectively, compared to H2O2 suggested that these combinations reduced the risk of mortality by 79, 65 and 63 %, respectively (Fig. 3c).

Effect of kombucha (black tea, hop, madimak and hawthorn) supplemented with hydrogen peroxide (0.05 M) on lifespan parameters in Oregon R+ strain of flies: a) survival curves, b) mean and maximum lifespan±standard error, and c) hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate the level of statistical significance (**p<0.01, ***p<0.001, log-rank test (a), Dunnett’s t-test compared to H2O2 (b), Cox proportional hazards regression (c)). N(fly)=150 for each condition. BT=black tea, HO=hop, M=madimak, H=hawthorn


The lifespan of flies that consumed different combinations of kombucha with K2Cr2O7 did not increase compared to K2Cr2O7 alone (log-rank, χ2=285, p<0.0001) (Fig. 4a). The median lifespan of flies supplemented with black tea-flavoured kombucha with K2Cr2O7 (36 days) increased by 125 %, the mean lifespan (34.2 days) increased by 86.9 %, while the maximum lifespan decreased by 3 % compared to the treatment with K2Cr2O7 alone (Fig. 4a and Fig. 4b). The median lifespan of hop kombucha with K2Cr2O7 (34 days) increased by 112.5 %, the mean lifespan (32.3 days) increased by 76.7 %, while the maximum lifespan decreased 16.1 % compared to K2Cr2O7 alone. With both madimak- and hawthorn-flavoured kombucha with K2Cr2O7, the median, mean and maximum lifespan decreased. As shown in Fig. 4c, madimak- and hawthorn-flavoured kombucha with K2Cr2O7 had higher hazard ratio than K2Cr2O7 alone and increased the risk of mortality by 114 and 78 %, respectively.

Effect of kombucha (black tea, hop, madimak and hawthorn) supplemented with potassium dichromate (1 mM) on the lifespan parameters in Oregon R+ strain of flies: a) survival curves, b) mean and maximum lifespan±standard error, and c) hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate the level of statistical significance (***p<0.001, log-rank test (a), Dunnett’s t-test compared to PD (b), Cox proportional hazards regression (c)). N(fly)=150 for each condition. PD=potassium dichromate(VI), BT=black tea, HO=hop, M=madimak, H=hawthorn


There is limited data on the effect of kombucha on the lifespan of the fruit fly. To the best of our knowledge, no kombucha preparations have been used for fruit flies and no study has been conducted on kombucha preparations with Humulus lupulus (hop), Crataegus monogyna (hawthorn) and Polygonum cognatum (madimak). The concentration and the type of phenolic compounds can interfere with the bioactive effects of kombucha. According to our previous study (23), the tested black tea-flavoured kombucha (14 days of fermentation) had the highest antioxidant activity (655 µmol/mL), followed by hop-flavoured kombucha (634 µmol/mL). In addition, a strong correlation was found between the total flavonoid content and the antioxidant activity (r=0.69, p<0.05). The antioxidant activity of black tea-flavoured kombucha could be related to the processes that tea (Camellia sinensis L.) leaves undergo during preparation, which activate polyphenol oxidases, leading to catechin oxidation and the production of theaflavins and thearubigins (42). Various studies have been conducted on some ingredients that are consistent with our study. Black tea extract (commercial brand without further dilution) has been reported to increase the median lifespan of Oregon R strain of Drosophila by 20.2 % (43).

Hops are rich in xanthohumol, which was later reported to increase the median lifespan by 10.41 % and the maximum lifespan by 8.88 % in Oregon R-C strain of Drosophila at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL (44). It is worth noting that in some cases a single component can have a negative effect. For example, caffeine at a concentration of 0.03 mg/mL reduced median lifespan by 22.86 % and the maximum lifespan by 11.6 % in Canton-S strain of Drosophila (45). However, black tea-flavoured kombucha, which contains the highest amount of caffeic acid as a mixture of polyphenols, extended the lifespan of the fruit fly.

CONCLUSIONS

Kombucha is a fermented beverage with a high content of probiotics. To enhance the beneficial properties of this drink, studies are being conducted on kombucha flavoured with beneficial herbs. This is the first study to investigate the effects of kombucha drinks flavoured with hawthorn, hop and madimak on the lifespan of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster). Hop-flavoured kombucha has an antigenotoxic effect and can extend the lifespan of Drosophila treated with H2O2 and K2Cr2O7, although its antioxidant composition is similar to that of black tea-flavoured kombucha and the other flavoured kombuchas. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the remaining genotoxicity endpoints, such as DNA breaks, to ensure the safety of hop-flavoured kombucha for consumers.

FUNDING

This research did not receive any funding.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTION

A.Y. Burgazlı wrote the original draft of the manuscript, performed the SMART assay and SMART data analysis. G. Tagorti wrote the original draft of the manuscript, performed the lifespan assay and lifespan data analysis. B. Yalçın and M. Güneş participated in performing the SMART assay. B. Eroğlu and E. Delik participated in the preparation of kombuchas. B.E. Tefon Öztürk participated in the preparation of kombuchas and revised the manuscript. B. Kaya revised and edited the manuscript and collected SMART assay data. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

REFERENCES
  1. da Silva Júnior J, Meireles Mafaldo Í, de Lima Brito I, Tribuzy de Magalhães Cordeiro A. Kombucha: Formulation, chemical composition, and therapeutic potentialities. CRFS. 2022;5:360-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2022.01.023, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/35198995
  2. Jayabalan R, Malbaša R, Lončar E, Vitas J, Sathishkumar M. A review on kombucha tea - Microbiology, composition, fermentation, beneficial effects, toxicity, and tea fungus. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2014;13(4):538-50, https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12073, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/33412713
  3. Kapp J, Sumner W. Kombucha: A systematic review of the empirical evidence of human health benefit. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;30:66-70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.11.001, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/30527803
  4. Tran T, Grandvalet C, Verdier F, Martin A, Alexandre H, Tourdot-Maréchal R. Microbial dynamics between yeasts and acetic acid bacteria in kombucha: impacts on the chemical composition of the beverage. Foods. 2020;9(7):963, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9070963, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/32708248
  5. Cardoso R, Neto R, dos Santos D’Almeida C, do Nascimento T, Presste C, Azevedo L. Kombuchas from green and black teas have different phenolic profile, which impacts their antioxidant capacities, antibacterial and antiproliferative activities. Food Res Int. 2020;128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108782, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/31955755
  6. de Noronha M, Cardoso R, dos Santos D’Almeida C, do Carmo M, Azevedo L, Gonçalves Maltarollo V. Black tea kombucha: Physicochemical, microbiological and comprehensive phenolic profile changes during fermentation, and antimalarial activity. Food Chem. 2022;384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132515, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/35219993
  7. Ayed L, Ben Abid S, Hamdi M. Development of a beverage from red grape juice fermented with the kombucha consortium. Ann Microbiol. 2017;67:111-21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-016-1242-2
  8. Xia X, Dai Y, Wu H, Liu X, Wang Y, Yin L. Kombucha fermentation enhances the health-promoting properties of soymilk beverage. J Funct Foods. 2019;62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.103549
  9. Pure A, Pure M. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of kombucha beverages prepared using banana peel, common nettles and black tea Infusions. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2016;3(2):125-30, https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v3i2.11138
  10. Korpelainen H, Pietiläinen M. Hop (Humulus lupulus L.): Traditional and present use, and future potential. Econ Bot. 2021;75(3-4):302-22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-021-09528-1
  11. Hans M, Bansal R, Shah MA. Deeksha. Humulus lupulus L.: Beer plant. In: Sharma A, Nayik GA, editors. Immunity boosting medicinal plants of the Western Himalayas. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 231–52. 10.1007/978-981-19-9501-9_1010.1007/978-981-19-9501-9_10, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9501-9_1010.1007/978-981-19-9501-9_10
  12. Zanoli P, Zavatti M. Pharmacognostic and pharmacological profile of Humulus lupulus L. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116(3):383-96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2008.01.011, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/18308492
  13. Karabin M, Hudcova T, Jelinek L, Dostalek P. Biotransformations and biological activities of hop flavonoids. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(6 Pt 2):1063-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.009, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25708386
  14. Büchter C, Havermann S, Koch K, Wätjen W. Isoxanthohumol, a constituent of hop (Humulus lupulus L.), increases stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans dependent on the transcription factor DAF-16. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55(1):257-65, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-0843-z, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/25644181
  15. Zugravu C, Bohiltea R, Salmen T, Pogurschi E, Otelea M. Antioxidants in hops: Bioavailability, health effects and perspectives for new products. Antioxidants. 2022;11(2):241, https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020241, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/35204124
  16. Bayir Y, Tagiyeva N, Albayrak A, Ismayilov A, Akpinar E, Toktay E. Effects of Polygonum cognatum Meissn. extract on indomethacin induced gastric damage in rats. Biotech Histochem. 2023;98(6):424-31, https://doi.org/10.1080/10520295.2023.2221040, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/37291906
  17. Demirpolat A. Chemical composition of essential oils of seven polygonum species from Turkey: A chemotaxonomic approach. Molecules. 2022;27(24):9053, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27249053, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/36558187
  18. Karakaya S, Süntar I, Yakinci O, Sytar O, Ceribasi S, Dursunoglu B. In vivo bioactivity assessment on Epilobium species: A particular focus on Epilobium angustifolium and its components on enzymes connected with the healing process. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113207, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/32730870
  19. Fichtner A, Wissemann V. Biological flora of the british isles: Crataegus monogyna. J Ecol. 2021;109(1):541-71, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13554
  20. Belabdelli F, Bekhti N, Piras A, Benhafsa F, Ilham M, Adil S. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of Crataegus monogyna leaves’ extracts. Nat Prod Res. 2022;36(12):3234-9, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2021.1958215, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/34334069
  21. Keser S, Celik S, Turkoglu S, Yilmaz O, Turkoglu I. The investigation of some bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties of hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna subsp. monogyna Jacq.). J Intercult Ethnopharmacol. 2014;3(2):51-5, https://doi.org/10.5455/jice.20140120103320, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/26401347
  22. Gaivão I, Ferreira J, Sierra LM. The w/w + somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) of Drosophila melanogaster for detecting antigenotoxic activity. In: Soloneski S, Larramendy ML, editors. Genotoxicity and mutagenicity - Mechanisms and test methods. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. 10.5772/intechopen.9163010.5772/intechopen.91630, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.9163010.5772/intechopen.91630
  23. Ogienko A, Omelina E, Bylino O, Batin M, Georgiev P, Pindyurin A. Drosophila as a model organism to study basic mechanisms of longevity. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11244, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911244, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/36232546
  24. Reiter L, Potocki L, Chien S, Gribskov M, Bier E. A systematic analysis of human disease-associated gene sequences in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. 2001;11(6):1114-25, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.169101, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/11381037
  25. Kurşun A, Yalcin B, Güneş M, Tagorti G, Kaya B. Antigenotoxic effect of resveratrol against genotoxicity induced by cobalt nanoparticles in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Eurasian J Bio Chem Sci.. 2022;5(2):50-5, https://doi.org/10.46239/ejbcs.1069388
  26. Piper MDW, Partridge L. Protocols to study aging in Drosophila. In: Dahmann C, editor. Drosophila. Methods in molecular biology, vol. 1478. New York, NY, USA: Humana Press; 2016. pp. 291-302. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_1810.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_18, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_1810.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_18
  27. Tefon Öztürk B, Eroğlu B, Delik E, Çiçek M, Çiçek E. Comprehensive evaluation of three important herbs for kombucha fermentation. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2023;61(1):127-37, https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.61.01.23.7789, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/37200785
  28. Graf U, Würgler F, Katz A, Frei H, Juon H, Hall C. Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Mutagen. 1984;6(2):153-88, https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2860060206, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/6423380
  29. Lindsley DL, Zimm GG. GENES. In: The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; 1992. pp. 1-803. 10.1016/B978-0-12-450990-0.50005-810.1016/B978-0-12-450990-0.50005-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-450990-0.50005-810.1016/B978-0-12-450990-0.50005-8
  30. Marcos R, Carmona ER. The wing-spot and the comet tests as useful assays for detecting genotoxicity in Drosophila. In: Dhawan A, Bajpayee M, editors. Genotoxicity assessment. Methods in molecular biology, vol. 2031. New York, NY, USA: Humana; 2019. pp. 337-48. [Accessed 2 February 2022]. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9646-9_1910.1007/978-1-4939-9646-9_19, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9646-9_1910.1007/978-1-4939-9646-9_19
  31. Kastenbaum M, Bowman K. Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutat Res. 1970;9(5):527-49, https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(70)90038-2, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/5424720
  32. Frei H, Würgler F. Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from Drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative, or inconclusive result. Mutat Res. 1988;203(4):297-308, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(88)90019-2, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/3136327
  33. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, v. 22.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA; 2013.
  34. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2022. Available from: https://www.R-project.org
  35. Liu F, Last K, Henry T, Reinardy H. Interspecific differences in oxidative DNA damage after hydrogen peroxide exposure of sea urchin coelomocytes. Mutagenesis. 2023;38(1):13-20, https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac018, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/36130095
  36. Patlolla A, Barnes C, Hackett D, Tchounwou P. Potassium dichromate induced cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative stress in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(2):643-53, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6020643, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/19440407
  37. Alaraby M, Hernández A, Marcos R. Copper oxide nanoparticles and copper sulphate act as antigenotoxic agents in Drosophila melanogaster Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017;58(1):46-55, https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22068, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28079919
  38. Fernández-Bedmar Z, Demyda-Peyrás S, Merinas-Amo T, del Río-Celestino M. Nutraceutic potential of two Allium species and their distinctive organosulfur compounds: A multi-assay evaluation. Foods. 2019;8(6):222, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060222, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/31234398
  39. Akila P, Vennila L. Chlorogenic acid a dietary polyphenol attenuates isoproterenol induced myocardial oxidative stress in rat myocardium: An in vivo study. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;84:208-14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.09.028, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/27657829
  40. Song J, Guo D, Bi H. Chlorogenic acid attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress in lens epithelial cells. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41(2):765-72, https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2017.3302, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/29207051
  41. Anter J, Romero-Jiménez M, Fernández-Bedmar Z, Villatoro-Pulido M, Analla M, Alonso-Moraga Á. Antigenotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and apoptosis induction by apigenin, bisabolol, and protocatechuic acid. J Med Food. 2011;14(3):276-83, https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2010.0139, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/21182433
  42. Martínez Leal J, Valenzuela Suárez L, Jayabalan R, Huerta Oros J, Escalante-Aburto A. A review on health benefits of kombucha nutritional compounds and metabolites. CYTA J Food. 2018;16(1):390-9, https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2017.1410499
  43. Massie H, Aiello V, Williams T. Inhibition of iron absorption prolongs the life span of Drosophila. Mech Ageing Dev. 1993;67(3):227-37, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-6374(93)90001-8, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/8326745
  44. Wongchum N, Dechakhamphu A. Xanthohumol prolongs lifespan and decreases stress-induced mortality in Drosophila melanogaster. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021;244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.108994, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/33549830
  45. Suh H, Shin B, Han S, Woo M, Hong K. Behavioral changes and survival in Drosophila melanogaster effects of ascorbic acid, taurine, and caffeine. Biol Pharm Bull. 2017;40(11):1873-82, https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b17-00321, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/29093334