getpdf  NLM-PubMed-Logo  https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5349 

Cloning and Characterization of Limonoid Glucosyltransferase from Kinnow Mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco)


Sumedha Arora1orcid tiny, Prashant Mohanpuria1*orcid tiny, Gurupkar Singh Sidhu1orcid tiny, Inderjit Singh Yadav1orcid tiny and Vandna Kumari2orcid tiny


1School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, IN-141004 Ludhiana, India
2Botany Department, Punjabi University, IN-147002 Patiala, India



Article history:
Received: 19 May 2017
Accepted: 30 November 2017
cc


Key words:
Kinnow mandarin, delayed bitterness, limonoid glucosyltransferase, anticancer properties, semi-quantitative PCR



Summary:
Kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) is a popular citrus crop of northwestern India and it occupies maximum fruit area in Punjab. However, citrus juice processing industry is still suffering from delayed bitterness problem caused mainly by limonoid aglycones such as limonin. In order to study citrus limonoid metabolism, limonoid glucosyltransferase (LGT) gene, which encodes a natural debittering enzyme, was isolated from the fruit tissues of Kinnow mandarin. After confirmation and characterization, its full-length gene sequence (1533 bp) was submitted to National Centre for Biotechnology Information. Citrus reticulata limonoid glucosyltransferase (CrLGT) occupies a position on an independent branch in the largest subgroup and is phylogenetically different from those in other mandarin species like C. unshiu, showing its uniqueness in several features. The transcript expression of CrLGT, evaluated in different tissues such as young leaf, flavedo, albedo, sac covering and seed of Kinnow mandarin during early (90 days after flowering (DAF)), mid (150-210 DAF) and late (240 DAF) fruit developmental stages using semi-quantitative method, showed the highest expression in flavedo. Thus, it was concluded that the isolated LGT gene has an effect on limonoid metabolic engineering in citrus. Overexpression of this gene can reduce the delayed bitterness problem in citrus juice and enhance the accumulation of specific glucosides that have anticancer effects.




*Corresponding author: tel3  +9101612401960, ext. 270
                                           email3  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

INTRODUCTION

Kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) is a commercially important citrus fruit crop of northwestern India. It is a hybrid between King and Willow leaf mandarin (C. nobilis Lour. × C. deliciosa Tenora) and belongs to Rutaceae family. China, Brazil, USA, India, Mexico and Spain are the world’s leading citrus fruit producing countries and they account for two-thirds of the global production annually. India produces 10.48 million tonnes of citrus fruits and ranks fourth in production globally (1). Kinnow mandarin occupies 61.9% of total fruit area in Punjab and thus ranks first in fruit production in India (2). Despite this, citrus industry in India has been suffering from delayed bitterness problem caused by limonoids, mainly limonin (3). Bitterness makes the juice unacceptable to consumers and thus has a significantly negative economic impact (4). Kinnow mandarin seed, peel and juice have been reported to contain 2500, 80 and 20 mg/L of limonin respectively, which is well above 6 mg/L threshold level. As a result, juice producers have to discard the juice, blend it with sugar solution or remove the bitter limonoids, which otherwise degrade the quality of the juice.

Limonoids are a group of highly oxygenated triterpenes present in Citrus species and genera belonging to the family Meliaceae. Limonoids occur in two forms, as bitter aglycones and as non-bitter glucosides in fruits and seeds of Citrus spp. (5). Intensely bitter limonoids such as limonin (dilactone) are gradually produced from the non-bitter precursor, limonoate A-ring lactone (LARL) (monolactone) during juicing process, usually due to freezing or physical damage of the citrus fruits. This process proceeds under acidic conditions in immature fruits and is accelerated by the action of limonin D-ring lactone hydrolase (LLH), i.e. delayed bitterness (6). Although limonoid aglycones endogenously convert into tasteless limonoid glucosides, this natural debittering process is catalyzed by limonoid glucosyltransferase (LGT), but only during fruit maturation (7, 8). Young immature fruit tissue contains only limonoid aglycones, while the mature one contains both aglycones and glucosides. This inter-conversion of aglycones to glucosides occurs as the fruit ripens and is carried out by these two regulatory enzymes, i.e. LGT and LLH (9).

Apart from causing delayed bitterness, recently citrus limonoids have been shown to have biological activity against several types of cancers, specifically against brain (10), colon, pancreas and breast cancers (11-14). Furthermore, citrus limonoids, specifically limonoid glucosides, which are the product of glucosyltransferase enzyme, are water-soluble and have good bioavailability and non-toxic effects in animals and humans. Thus, they can easily be used as nutraceuticals and health fortifiers in many functional foods (15).

Out of two important regulatory genes in limonoid biosynthetic pathway (Fig. 1) in most of the Citrus spp., only gene encoding LGT has been isolated from navel orange (GenBank accession number EU531465), satsuma mandarin (GenBank accession number AB033758) (16, 17), lime (GenBank accession number EU531463) and grapefruit (GenBank accession number EU531464) (18). In citrus limonoid biosynthetic pathway, nomilin is the initial precursor of all limonoids synthesized in phloem region of the stem. Stem nomilin formed is translocated to other tissues including leaves, fruits and roots, where nomilin or deacetylnomilin are further capable of biosynthesizing other limonoids. Since the LGT alone seems to be capable enough of natural debittering process in fruits of citrus plants, its isolation from Kinnow mandarin would be important for creating transgenic citrus free from limonoid bitterness.

The limonoid metabolism pathway in citrus plants. Limonoid glucosyltransfease (LGT) is the only single regulatory enzyme that is able to convert all limonoid aglycones such as nomilin, obacunone and ichangin present in Citrus spp. to their respective glucosides, in addition to limonoate A-ring lactone (LARL) to limonin glucopyranoside. During juicing process bitter limonin is immediately produced from LARL precursor by limonin D-ring lactone hydrolase (LLH) regulatory enzyme, especially in early to mid-stage developed citrus fruits


The overexpression of LGT in citrus can enhance the utilization of accumulated precursor (LARL) and thus reduce the formation of bitter limonin in fruit tissues upon damage. Furthermore, this would lead to higher production of limonoid glucoside molecules, which have anticancer properties (12, 13). Thus, keeping in mind the importance of citrus limonoids in delayed bitterness problem and human health, the present study has been designed for the first time in India to clone and characterize full length LGT gene from the fruit of Kinnow mandarin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemical reagents and supplies

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck (St. Louis, MO, USA). Restriction enzymes were obtained from New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA, while Taq DNA polymerase, SuperScript III reverse transcriptase, and T4 DNA ligase were obtained from Invitrogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Skokie, IL, USA. QIAquick gel extraction kit, DNeasy plant mini kit, RNeasy plant mini kit and QIAprep spin miniprep kits were the products of QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany.

Plant materials

Vegetative and fruit tissues of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) were collected from Fruit Research Farm, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, during the seasons 2014-2016 and analyzed at School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

Cloning and sequence analysis of Citrus reticulata limonoid glucosyltransferase (CrLGT)

For cloning, total RNA was isolated from young leaves and fruit tissues (peel, seed and sac covering) of Kinnow mandarin using RNeasy plant mini kit as described in its manual. The quality of total RNA isolated was checked with NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A mass of 2 µg of total RNA from each of the samples was used to prepare cDNA by using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase following the manufacturer’s protocol. The 26S rRNA amplification was used as an internal control in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). LGT gene sequences of various Citrus spp. such as C. maxima (EU304828.1), C. unshiu (AB033758.1), C. paradisi (EU531464.1), C. limettioides (EU531463.1), C. aurantium (EU531466.1) and C. sinensis (EU531465.1) were retrieved from GenBank at NCBI (19). These gene sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL X tool (20) and conserved regions were identified. Based on the conserved regions, three LGT gene-specific primer sets were designed using PerlPrimer tool (21) and DNA primers of 25 nM were custom synthesized. An aliquot of 2 µL of the cDNA library was used as a template to carry out PCR in Thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Three sets of primers were applied in different PCR reactions and out of these, optimal amplifications were obtained with set 3 (GT F3 5’ATGGGAACTGAATCTCTTGTTCAT 3’ and GT R3 5’TCAATACTGTACACGTGTCCGTCG 3’), the amplified product was separated on 1% agarose gel in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer at 90 V for 1 h and gel photograph was taken using gel documentation system (Ultra-Violet Products Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Desired PCR band was cut, purified from agarose gel and ligated into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) in 3:1 ratio. This ligated product was transformed into Escherichia coli (DH5α). The produced bacterial colonies were selected on Luria-Bertani (LB) plate containing ampicillin. These colonies were screened through PCR using the above-mentioned primers. The recombinant pGEM-T Easy plasmid was isolated from positive colonies (colonies 2-6) and was used for sequencing of the insert. The sequences of these inserts were confirmed through BLASTn (22) analysis. Further, CrLGT final nucleotide sequence was characterized by ExPASy tool (23). The predicted CrLGT protein sequence was also searched in Pfam database (24). To identify the probable cellular localization of CrLGT protein in plant cells, SignalP-4.1 server (25) was used.

PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of limonoid glucosyltransferase gene

To analyze Citrus reticulata limonoid glucosyltransferase (CrLGT) gene structure, firstly, we isolated genomic DNA from young leaves of three ancestral Citrus spp. such as citron, pummelo and Kinnow mandarin. PCR amplifications of CrLGT using genomic DNA isolated from Citrus spp. and cDNA prepared from RNA isolated from Kinnow mandarin were carried out using GT F3 and GT R3 primer set. After 35 cycles of PCR, the PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gel. Secondly, after getting the gene sequence, a restriction map of CrLGT gene was constructed using NEBcutter V2.0 (26) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) pattern was generated by using BglII restriction enzyme. For this, BglII was used for restriction digestion of purified LGT from the Citrus spp. A volume of 25 µL of digestion reaction contained 21.5 μL of purified LGT, 2.5 μL of 10× NEBuffer 3.1 and 1 μL of BglII (10 U/ μL) enzyme. After overnight digestion at 37 °C, the digested products were resolved on 1.2% agarose gel and the photograph was taken using gel documentation system (Ultra-Violet Products Ltd.) to visualize gene fragment size.

Semiquantitative PCR for CrLGT transcript expression

In order to investigate the correlation of transcript expression of LGT in vegetative and fruit tissues of Kinnow mandarin with delayed bitterness problem in its juice, the present experiment was conducted. Total RNA was isolated from vegetative and fruit tissues of Kinnow mandarin at different fruit developmental stages, i.e. early (July, 90 days after flowering (DAF)), mid (September to November, 150-210 DAF) and late (December, 240 DAF). The cDNA was prepared using 2 μg of total RNA. An equal quantity of cDNA from each of the samples was used for RT-PCR analysis. RT-PCR was carried out using CrLGT gene specific primer set (GT F3 and GT R3) as described earlier. Optimal amplification of CrLGT transcript was standardized at exponential phase in PCR. The PCR-amplified product was separated on 1% agarose gel. The relative level of LGT transcript expression was estimated densitometrically using gel documentation system (Ultra-Violet Products Ltd.).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Molecular cloning of CrLGT from Kinnow mandarin and its sequence comparison

The quality and quantity of total RNA isolated from young leaves and fruit tissues (peel and seed) of Kinnow mandarin were checked on 1% denaturing agarose gel. On agarose gel, presence of intact 28S and 18S rRNA bands validated the good quality of isolated RNA (Fig. 2a lower panel).

Isolation of limonoid glucosyltransferase gene (LGT) from Kinnow mandarin: a) cDNA-PCR amplification of LGT from young leaves (YL), peel (P) and seed (S), b) colony PCR result showing cloning of CrLGT into pGEM-T Easy, and c) PCR amplifications of CrLGT from genomic DNA of citron (1), pummelo (2) and Kinnow mandarin (3) as well as cDNA from peel and young leaves of Kinnow mandarin, where M=1000 bp DNA ladder loaded and NC=negative control (PCR product with no template) was loaded


The cDNA prepared using RNA from young leaves and peel was used for PCR amplification with 26S rRNA gene-specific primers (as an internal control). Using cDNA library as a template, PCR was carried out with the full-length gene-specific primers. Among three sets of primers, there was no PCR amplification observed with the primer pair GT F1 and GT R1, but PCR amplifications were observed with primer set 2 (GT F2 and GT R2) (figure not shown) and set 3 (GT F3 and GT R3) (Fig. 2a-Fig. 2c). The PCR products resulted in approx. 1.6-kb band using a primer set 3, while multiple bands were observed with primer set 2. Therefore, the desired purified PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector, which was then transformed into E. coli (DH5α). The five positive colonies (containing insert) were screened through colony PCR (Fig. 2b). DNA sequencing of the insert produced a full length sequence of CrLGT of 1533 bp with an open reading frame (ORF) encoding a protein of 211 amino acids with a molecular mass of approx. 28 kDa, which was shorter than the earlier reported Citrus LGT (Fig. 3).

The nucleotide sequence of the cDNA encoding limonoid glucosyltransferase (LGT) from Kinnow mandarin (GenBank accession number KP306791) and the deduced amino acid sequences. Underlined sequence is the deduced 211 amino acid sequence using the functional open reading frame (ORF) of LGT. Nucleotides are numbered above as well as on the right side of the sequence, and the deduced amino acid residues at the far right


Earlier, genes encoding LGT of sizes 1.7 kb from satsuma mandarin (C. unshiu; AB033758.1), 1.5 kb each from navel orange (C. sinensis; EU531465.1) (16, 17), lime (C. limettioides; EU531463.1) and grapefruit (C. paradisi; EU531464.1) (18) were reported. The present LGT gene sequence is approx. 200 bp shorter than the earlier reported in mandarin and thus, this is a unique LGT gene sequence from Citrus reticulata reported for the first time in India. Fortunately and interestingly, this gene sequence contains start and stop codons. We compared this gene sequence with other reported LGT sequences (GenBank accession numbers: EU531463.1, EU531466.1, AB033758.1, EU531465.1, EU304828.1, EU531464.1, EU531467.1 and EF119744.1). CLUSTAL X multiple sequence alignment of CrLGT sequence with these sequences showed a high level of sequence conservation. We have noted 9 indels in this sequence [single nuceotide addition (positions 28 and 1479) and deletions (positions 49-50, 267-268, 959-960, 1004-1005 and 1501-1502), two nuceotide additions (position 1489-1492) and deletions (positions 1508-1509)] (Fig. 4). When the CrLGT protein sequence was compared with that of LGT from satsuma mandarin, 139 amino acids from start and 161 amino acids from end were missing, but interestingly, the plant secondary product glucosyltransferase (PSPG) box was intact, showing functionality of desired protein. Most of the plant GTase are reported to have molecular mass in the range of 40 to 58 kDa (7), in contrast to 28-kDa translated protein of CrLGT sequence. These insertions and deletions could have resulted in shorter protein in the present case.

Comparison of Citrus reticulata limonoid glucosyltransfease (CrLGT) from Kinnow mandarin with other cDNA sequences of glucosyltransferases. CLUSTAL X (20) multiple sequence alignment of CrLGT sequence with other sequences shows a high level of sequence conservation


Based on BLASTn (22) analysis, the isolated gene showed 98% sequence identity with the limonoid uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucosyltransferase gene from Citrus sinensis (EU531465.1), C. paradisi (EU531464.1), C. limettioides (EU531463.1) and C. unshiu (AB033758.1). Phylogenetic diagram of nucleotide sequences of different citrus limonoid glucosyltransferases showing three groups was prepared, where the lowest branch is covering most of the sequences including LGT sequence from Kinnow mandarin (Fig. 5). The CrLGT occupies independent branch position in the largest subgroup and is phylogenetically different from that of other mandarins such as C. unshiu and thus, showing its uniqueness.

Phylogenetic diagram of nucleotide sequences of different citrus limonoid glucosyltransferases (LGTs). The isolated CrLGT (GenBank accession number KP306791) is occupying independent branch position in the largest subgroup


The CrLGT sequence analysis by ExPASy tool (23) revealed the longest ORF of 636 bp codes for 211 amino acids (Fig. 3). In order to identify conserved domain in this protein sequence, BLAST conserved domain database (27) search was used, which confirmed that it belongs to the superfamily PLN03004 (UDP-glycosyltransferase). The protein sequence was also searched in Pfam database (24) to identify the family it belongs to, and it was matched with UDPGT (UDP-glucuronosyl and UDP-glucosyltransferase) family from amino acid positions 104 to 179. The predicted amino acid sequence was used for protein search in BLAST (19) at NCBI and was found to share 99% identity with LGT of C. sinensis (ACD14145.1), 94% identity with LGT of C. paradisi (ACD14144.1), 97% identity with LGT of C. maxima (ABY27084.1) and 99% with that of C. unshiu (ABX46237.1). In order to identify the cellular location of CrLGT protein, we used the SignalP-4.1 (25) server to predict the presence of any signal peptide. No signal peptide region was predicted for its translated sequence, which suggests that the protein is probably expressed or accumulated in the cytoplasm. After several comparisons and confirmation of this full-length LGT gene sequence, it was submitted to NCBI (GenBank accession number KP306791).

Structure of CrLGT genomic and cDNA sequence

In order to confirm the presence/absence of any intron in the CrLGT gene, we compared the sequences of CrLGT from genomic DNA and cDNA amplifications in PCR, which resulted in an equally sized band of 1.5 kb with the same nucleotide sequence and this revealed the intronless LGT gene isolated in this work (Fig. 2c). In a similar manner earlier, LGT from navel orange was also reported to have no introns at all (17). These facts are true as several glucosyltransferases have been reported from plants with no intron or fewer number of introns such as zeatin O-glucosyltransferase from Phaseolus lunatus (28). In addition, members of glycosyltransferase to which glucosyltransferases belong also lack or possess very low number of introns such as glycosyltransferase reported from Arabidopsis thaliana (29).

In order to study any nucleotide sequence variation in LGT from three ancestral Citrus spp. such as Kinnow mandarin, pummelo and citron (30), BglII restriction site was chosen for generating its RFLP pattern. However, no sequence variation was observed based on the restricted fragments (data not shown). This indicates that Kinnow mandarin may contain the homozygous loci for the isolated LGT. Earlier, Kita et al. (16) reported two alleles, CitLGT-1 and CitLGT-2, in satsuma mandarin (C. unshiu), while the navel orange (C. sinensis) was demonstrated to be homozygous for CitLGT-1. PCR-RFLP pattern from the progeny of Miyagawa wase (a cultivar of Satsuma mandarin) and Kiyomi tangor (a hybrid between Miyagawa wase and Trovita orange) revealed three allelic structures (CitLGT-1/CitLGT-1, CitLGT-1/Cit-LGT-2, and CitLGT-2/CitLGT-2).

Limonoid glucosyltransferase expression in vegetative and fruit tissues of Kinnow mandarin

The transcript expression of CrLGT was evaluated in different tissues such as young leaf, peel (including flavedo and albedo), sac covering and seed of Kinnow mandarin (Fig. 6a-Fig. 6d) during early (July, 90 DAF), mid (September to November, 150-210 DAF) and late (December, 240 DAF) fruit developmental stages using semi-quantitative method.

Limonoid glucosyltransferase (LGT) transcript expression in vegetative and fruit tissues of Kinnow mandarin: a) young leaf (YL) and immature, and mature fruit parts (F=flavedo, A=albedo, P=peel, Sc=sac covering and S=seed), b-d) expression levels of LGT in different tissues during early (90 days after flowering (DAF), July), mid (150-210 DAF, September to November) and late (240 DAF, December) fruit developmental stages. The lower panel in gel pictures shows expression of 26S rRNA as an internal control. Bar diagram represents relative levels of transcript expression


Distinctive juice delayed bitterness problem in mandarins like satsuma has not been reported (18). However, based on our practical taste-based experiment with Kinnow mandarin juice, the delayed bitterness problem occurred during early to mid-fruit developmental stages (Table 1). Harvesting of Kinnow mandarin fruits in Punjab (India) starts in October and thus its juice will certainly have delayed bitterness problem.

Bitterness observed (tasted) in fruits of Kinnow mandarin at early, mid and late fruit developmental stages after 4 h of juice extraction at room temperature

    Fruit developmental stage     Bitterness of juice extracted with seeds     Bitterness of juice extracted without seeds
    July-August (early)     1     1
    September (mid)     2     2
    October (mid)     2     2.5
    November (mid)     3     3.5
    December (late)     4     4

Sensory evaluation scale of bitterness: 1=extremely bitter, 2=very bitter, 3=bitter, 4=moderately bitter (sweet), 5=slightly bitter (sweeter)

From July to October three types of tissues, i.e. young leaf, peel and seed were used for expression analysis of CrLGT, while from November to December, five tissues: young leaf, flavedo, albedo, sac covering and seed were used. Transcript expression of CrLGT was started 90 DAF only in peel tissue of Kinnow mandarin (Fig. 6b) in comparison to that of 60 DAF in fruit tissues (albedo) of satsuma mandarin (18), which is reported to have no distinctive juice delayed bitterness problem. A higher, as well as early expression of LGT, was observed in peel (including flavedo and albedo) than in all other tissues in three fruit developmental stages. However, the delayed bitterness was still present in Kinnow mandarin juice (Table 1). This shows that late expression of LGT in fruit tissues could be the cause of delayed bitterness production in citrus juices. Other than in the case of mandarin, in sweet lime and grapefruit, LGT started very late (210 DAF) in leaves and fruits and that could be the reason why these Citrus spp. have intense juice delayed bitterness (18). In another study of grapefruit (31), PGT 8 (putative glucosyltransferase) expression was found only in fruit tissues, particularly in segment membrane only after extended PCR cycles, while it was not quantifiable in vegetative tissues. In support of weak delayed bitterness during late citrus fruit developmental stage, it has been reported that the site of metabolization of limonoid aglycones to glucosides by LGT is limited only to the seed and mature fruits of citrus (32, 33). A similar LGT expression in leaves (150 DAF) has been observed in satsuma mandarin, as well as in Kinnow mandarin (Fig. 6c). As CrLGT expression in young leaf was constantly observed even up to the end of late fruit developmental stage, the delayed bitterness problem still existed in the fruit juice. This means that the expression pattern of CrLGT in leaves is not related to the bitterness level of fruit juice, as observed earlier (18). Furthermore, there are not any reports of transport of limonoid glucosides from leaf to fruit, and once synthesized in the leaf, they cannot be translocated to another part (32, 33).

In contrast to mandarin, LGT transcript expression in C. aurantium and C. sinensis starts from 120 DAF in albedo tissue, while in the leaves, it starts expressing after 180 DAF. In C. limettoides and C. paradisi (which are very sour in nature), LGT expression starts very late (180 DAF) in leaves and 210 DAF in albedo. During mid-fruit developmental stage of Kinnow mandarin, flavedo showed a higher relative transcript level of CrLGT, followed by sac covering and albedo, and it was higher than in young leaf and seed, where the expression pattern was somewhat similar after 180 and 210 DAF (Fig. 6c). Interestingly, this gene started to express in seed of Kinnow mandarin during the mid-stage but at a slow pace, which has not reported so far.

In the late stage of fruit development, CrLGT expression was maximum in flavedo and sac covering (Fig. 6d), as reported earlier in navel orange where CitLGT transcribed strongly in sac covering and albedo (17). Furthermore, an increase of CitLGT transcript level is parallel to the fruit maturation and thus conversion of LARL to limonoid glucoside and CitLGT mRNA accumulation could probably take place simultaneously with limonoid glucoside production. This suggests that CitLGT gene has certainly a regulatory role in limonoid glucoside accumulation and reduction of the bitterness in fruit tissues of citrus, especially in navel orange (34). In contrast to these studies, i.e. despite the high transcription of CitLGT mRNA in flower and fruit of navel orange at early stage (40 DAF), limonoid glucosides were not detected probably because of high glucosidase activity (35). In lemon, limonoid glucoside biosynthesis in fruit tissues and seeds was reported, but not in stems and leaves (36). Thus, it was noted that the expression was highest in peel, particularly in flavedo portion. Earlier, LGT expression was observed by RT-PCR analysis or Northern blot analysis in different Citrus spp. (16). Despite the expression of CrLGT during all fruit developmental stages of Kinnow mandarin, the delayed bitterness was observed. There is a possibility that post-translational modifications such as glycosylation and phosphorylation of LGT may be related to its gene expression in citrus. It could be possible to avoid delayed bitterness in Kinnow mandarin juices with a controlled higher expression of CrLGT. Taking into account that a single copy of regulatory gene present in the citrus genome converts all aglycones to their respective glucosides, the addition of extra copy of LGT would be purposeful for the accumulation of limonoid glucosides, which have potential anticancer properties (37).

CONCLUSIONS

The isolation of limonoid glucosyltransferase (LGT) gene from fruit tissues of Kinnow mandarin, a popular citrus cultivar of India, was investigated. The Citrus reticulata limonoid glucosyltransferase (CrLGT) has been reported as a key player for natural debittering and anticancer potential. This CrLGT showed several indels, absence of introns and produced a shorter translated product but with intact plant secondary product glucosyltransferase box, which is important for glycosylation. It occupied an independent branch position and thus is phylogenetically different from other LGT reported from mandarin. This isolated CrLGT gene showed highest expression in peel (flavedo) among tissues. Overexpression of this gene in citrus may divert its expression from flavedo to other useful parts like sac covering or seed to overcome the delayed bitterness problem in juices. Therefore, this gene will have a role in metabolic engineering of citrus limonoids for the production of food and medicine in future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are thankful to the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, for providing the internal grant to carry out the present research work. Authors are thankful to Dr. (Mrs.) Parveen Chunneja for providing bioinformatics facility funded by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India to carry out part of this work.

REFERENCES
  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Research Centre for Citrus. (ICAR-NRCC). Nagpur, India; 2015. Available from: http://www.ccringp.org.in/ccringp/PDF/2015/CCRINagpur(Vision2050).pdf
  2. Statement showing the district wise area, av. yield and production of various fruit crops for the year 2014-15 in the Punjab state. Directorate of Horticulture Punjab, Punjab, India; 2015. Avaialble from: http://punjabhorticulture.com/wp-content/themes/twentyeleven/document/fruits/Fruits%202014-15.pdf
  3. Puri M, Marwaha S, Kothari R, Kennedy J. Biochemical basis of bitterness in citrus fruit juices and biotech approaches for debittering. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 1996;16(2):145-55, https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559609147419
  4. Maier VP, Bennett RD, Hasegawa S. Limonin and other limonoids. In: Nagy S, Shaw P, Velduis MK, editors. Citrus science and technology. Westport, CT, USA: Avi Publishing Co; 1977. pp. 335-96.
  5. Manners G, Breksa A. Identifying citrus limonoid aglycones by HPLC-EI/MS and HPLC-APCI/MS techniques. Phytochem Anal. 2004;15(6):372-81, https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.790, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/15595452
  6. Maier V, Hasegawa S, Hera E. Limonin D-ring lactone hydrolase. A new enzyme from citrus seeds. Phytochemistry. 1969;8(2):405-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)85439-4
  7. Hasegawa S, Suhayda C, Hsu W, Robertson G. Purification of limonoid glucosyltransferase from navel orange albedo tissues. Phytochemistry. 1997;46(1):33-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00216-1
  8. Endo T, Kita M, Shimada T, Moriguchi T, Hidaka T, Matsumoto R. Modification of limonoid metabolism in suspension cell culture of Citrus. Plant Biotechnol. 2002;19(5):397-403, https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.19.397
  9. Hasegawa S, Ou P, Fong C, Herman Z, Coggins C, Atkin D. Changes in the limonoate A-ring lactone and limonin 17-beta-D-glucopyranoside content of navel oranges during fruit growth and maturation. J Agric Food Chem. 1991;39(2):262-5, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00002a008
  10. Poulose S, Harris E, Patil B. Antiproliferative effects of citrus limonoids against human neuroblastoma and colonic adenocarcinoma cells. Nutr Cancer. 2006;56(1):103-12, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327914nc5601_14, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17176224
  11. Miller E, Porter J, Binnie W, Guo I, Hasegawa S. Further studies on the anticancer activity of citrus limonoids. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(15):4908-12, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049698g, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/15264934
  12. Kim J, Jayaprakasha GK, Vikram A, Patil BS. Cancer chemopreventive properties of citrus limonoids. In: Patil BS, Jayaprakasha GK, Murthy KNC, Seeram NP, editors. Emerging trends in dietary components for preventing and combating disease. Washington, DC, USA: American Chemical Society; 2012. pp. 37-50.
  13. Chidambara Murthy K, Jayaprakasha G, Patil B. Citrus limonoids and curcumin additively inhibit human colon cancer cells. Food Funct. 2013;4(5):803-10, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fo30325j, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/23584140
  14. Tundis R, Loizzo M, Menichini F. An overview on chemical aspects and potential health benefits of limonoids and their derivatives. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54(2):225-50, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.581400, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/24188270
  15. Manners G, Jacob R, Breksa A, Schoch T, Hasegawa S. Bioavailability of citrus limonoids in humans. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(14):4156-61, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0300691, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/12822961
  16. Kita M, Hirata Y, Moriguchi T, Endo-Inagaki T, Matsumoto R, Hasegawa S. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel gene encoding limonoid UDP-glucosyltransferase in Citrus. FEBS Lett. 2000;469(2-3):173-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01275-8, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/10713266
  17. Kita M, Endo T, Shimada T, Moriguchi T, Hirata Y, Hasegawa S. Allelic structures of UDP-glucose: Limonoid glucosyltransferase affect limonoid bitterness in Citrus unshiu and C. sinensis. Euphytica. 2003;132:87-94, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024603114997
  18. Zaare-Nahandi F, Hosseinkhani S, Zamani Z, Asadi-Abkenar A, Omidbaigi R. Delay expression of limonoid UDP-glucosyltransferase makes delayed bitterness in citrus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;371(1):59-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.03.157, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/18407832
  19. Benson D, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman D, Ostell J. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D36-42, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1195, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/23193287
  20. Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown N, Chenna R, McGettigan P, McWilliam H. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947-8, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17846036
  21. Marshall O. PerlPrimer: Cross-platform, graphical primer design for standard, bisulphite and real-time PCR. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(15):2471-2, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth254, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/15073005
  22. Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403-10, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/2231712
  23. Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel R, Bairoch A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3784-8, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg563, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/12824418
  24. Finn R, Coggill P, Eberhardt R, Eddy S, Mistry J, Mitchell A. The PFam protein families database: Towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D279-85, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1344, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/26673716
  25. Nielsen H. Protein function prediction. In: Kihara D, editor. Methods in molecular biology, vol. 1611. New York, NY, USA: Springer Science+Business Media LLC; 2017. pp. 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5
  26. Vincze T, Posfai J, Roberts R. NEBcutter: A program to cleave DNA with restriction enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3688-91, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg526, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/12824395
  27. Marchler-Bauer A, Zheng C, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire M, Geer L, Geer R. CDD: Conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D348-52, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1243, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/23197659
  28. Martin R, Mok M, Mok D. A gene encoding the cytokinin enzyme zeatin O-xylosyltransferase of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1999;120(2):553-8, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.120.2.553, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/10364407
  29. Ross J, Li Y, Lim E, Bowles D. Higher plant glycosyltransferases. Genome Biol. 2001;2(2):S3004, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2001-2-2-reviews3004, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/11182895
  30. Swingle WT. The botany of citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD, editors. The citrus industry. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press; 1967. pp. 389-90.
  31. Daniel J, Owens D, McIntosh C. Secondary product glucosyltransferase and putative glucosyltransferase expression during Citrus paradisi (c.v. Duncan) growth and development. Phytochemistry. 2011;72(14-15):1732-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.04.024, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/21605881
  32. Herman Z, Fong C, Hasegawa S. Biosynthesis of limonoid glucosides in navel orange. Phytochemistry. 1991;30(5):1487-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(91)84193-V
  33. Fong C, Hasegawa S, Coggins C, Atkin D, Miyake M. Contents of limonoids and limonin 17-β-D-glucopyranoside in fruit tissue of Valencia orange during fruit growth and maturation. J Agric Food Chem. 1992;40(7):1178-81, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00019a019
  34. Moriguchi T, Kita M, Hasegawa S, Omura M. Molecular approach to citrus flavonoid and limonoid biosynthesis. J Food Agric Environ. 2003;1:22-5
  35. Hasegawa S, Miyake M. Biochemistry and biological functions of citrus limonoids. Food Rev Int. 1996;12(4):413-35, https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129609541089
  36. Fong C, Hasegawa S, Herman Z, Ou P. Biosynthesis of limonoid glucosides in lemon (Citrus limon). J Sci Food Agric. 1991;54(3):393-8, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740540310
  37. Arora S, Patel E, Sharma P, Sidhu GS, Mohanpuria P. Citrus limonoids: extraction, and metabolic engineering for human health. Book of abstracts of the 19th Punjab Science Congress on Influence of Science and Technology on Environment and Human Health; 2016 February 7-9, Mohali, Punjab, India. p. B-P03.