getpdf  NLM-PubMed-Logo  https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5414 

The Tunisian Artemisia Essential Oil for Reducing Contamination of Stored Cereals by Tribolium castaneum


Ikbal Chaieb1,2orcid tiny, Amel Ben Hamouda2*orcid tiny, Wafa Tayeb3orcid tiny, Khaoula Zarrad2orcid tiny, Thameur Bouslema2orcid tiny and Asma Laarif2orcid tiny


1Laboratory of Plant Protection, University of Carthage, National Agricultural Research Institute of Tunisia, Hédi Karray Street, TN-2049 Ariana, Tunis, Tunisia
2University of Sousse, Regional Centre of Research on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, 57, Chott Mariem, TN-4042 Sousse, Tunisia
3Biochemistry Laboratory, Nutrition-Functional Foods and Vascular Health, University of Monastir, Faculty of Medicine, Avicenne Street, TN-5019 Monastir, Tunisia



Article history:
Received: 16 July 2017
Accepted: 22 November 2017
cc


Key words:
Artemisia sp., essential oil, chemical composition, insecticidal activity, repellency



Summary:
Essential oils of three species of Artemisia genus (A. absinthium L., A. campestris L. and A. herba-alba (Asso)) were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and their potential insecticidal and repellent activities against the stored grain insect Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) was investigated. Fumigant and repellent activity bioassays were investigated in vitro. Chemical characterisation of essential oils showed that the bicyclic monoterpenes were predominant in all Artemisia essential oils, A. absinthium essential oil having the highest content of bicyclic monoterpenes, bicycloheptanes, naphthalenes and cycloalkenes. A. campestris had the highest content of sesquiterpenoids and acyclic monoterpenoids. A. herba-alba was characterised by the highest amounts of menthane monoterpenoids, oxanes, cumenes, oxolanes, ketones, benzenoids and monocyclic monoterpenes. Fumigant bioassay demonstrated that the three types of oil applied separately caused significant insect mortality. The lowest median lethal dose, LC50=142.8 μL/L, was observed with A. herba-alba. In repellency test, essential oil of A. absinthium was more potent with more rapid action than all other species. The mixture of Artemisia sp. essential oils showed an antagonistic effect in all the tested combinations. This study highlighted an important potential of Artemisia sp. especially A. herba-alba and A. absinthium in the control of the pests of stored products.



*Corresponding author:  email3  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

INTRODUCTION

Insects are considered as the major source of damage in stored grains. They often cause significant economic damage of 5 to 10% in the temperate zone and 20 to 30% in the tropical one (1). In modern storage technologies, controlling insects is managed by chemical insecticides, including both fumigants and contact insecticides, which present serious threat to human health and environment, leave residues and enhance insect resistance. Besides, the high cost of the treatment requires new alternatives for insect control (2). Fumigation is still among the most effective and widespread techniques for the control of stored product. Methyl bromide and phosphine are the two most common and widely used fumigants (3, 4). In addition, carbon dioxide and sulfuryl fluoride are also used for fumigation of stored grain as alternatives to phosphine (5). However, the current fumigants are a cause for some concerns since methyl bromide has been phased out in many countries including Tunisia because it has been found to cause stratospheric ozone layer depletion (4).

Contrary to chemical pesticides, natural aromatic products are less harmful to humans and the environment. Essential oils are recognized as alternatives to chemical fumigants. They are isolated from non-woody plant material by steam or hydrodistillation. They are composed essentially of terpenoids, represented by monoterpenes (C10) and sesquiterpenes (C15) and a minority of aromatic phenols, oxides, ethers, alcohols, esters, aldehydes and ketones that can attribute to the aromatic profile of the plant. The chemicals in essential oil play a crucial function in plant defense against fungal and insecticidal attacks (6). Besides their use in food products as preservatives (7), antioxidants (8) and antimicrobials (9), essential oil can also be applied as repellent or insecticide for treatment of stored products (10, 11). These constitute effective ecofriendly alternatives to synthetic pesticides (10). They have been considered as pesticides and they have been used since 1947. At least 24 essential oil-based pesticides are registered in the United States (12). Botanicals are considered safe to humans due to their relatively high median lethal dose (LD50) values to mammals so they have an important role in natural control strategies (13). The Artemisia genus is one of the most diversified among the Asteraceae family, which contains more than 500 species including a wide number of aromatic species (14) among which several species have an economic impact by their use in fragrance industry, medicine, food, forage, ornamentals or soil stabilizers (15). Our study focused on Artemisia species growing in Tunisia, especially on three species. The first is Artemisia herba-alba, which is the most commercially viable crop for industrial purposes in Tunisia. It constitutes 3% of the main essential oils destined for exportation (16). Moreover, it showed important antimicrobial and insecticidal effects (17, 18). The second species is Artemisia absinthium, which has been revealed to have several biological activities such as antimicrobial (19), acaricidal (20), insecticidal (18), anthelmintic, antiseptic, antispasmodic (21) and antioxidant (19). The third one is Artemisia campestris, showing several pharmacological activities such as antioxidant, antimicrobial and insecticidal (22).

In various studies essential oils have been extracted to screen their insecticidal activity without studying the relationship between the chemical composition and the relative activity. Moreover, few studies focused on the interactive effect of essential oils on their insecticidal activity.

In the present study, the insecticidal and repellent activities of A. absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba essential oils are investigated against Tribolium castaneum in relation to chemical composition. Furthermore, the assessment of binary combinations of the essential oils was performed to detect their interactive effects against the tested insect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and essential oil extraction

In this study the upper part of Artemisia absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba was used. These plants were collected from the region of Boughrara, Medenine, Tunisia (33°32´16˝N and 10°40´34˝E) during February 2012. Fresh shoots (200 g) were subjected to steam distillation by means of Clevenger apparatus (flask capacity 1000 mL, model TF-1000ml; TEFIC BIOTECH CO., Xi'an, PR China) with 400 mL of distilled water and boiled for 4 h at 100 °C. The extracted oil was weighed and stored at 4 °C until used.

GC-MS analysis of the essential oils

The essential oils were analysed with HP 6890N gas chromatograph (GC; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled with HP 5975B mass spectrometrer (MS; Agilent Technologies), equipped with a flame ionization detector and capillary column with HP-5 MS 5% phenylmethyl siloxane (30 m×0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) under the following conditions: temperature program: 50 °C for 2 min and raised at 7 °C/min to 250 °C, then held for 2 min, injector temperature was 240 °C, the carrier gas was helium, with a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min, injected volume was 1 μL, with split mode at ratio of 1:50, transfer line temperature was 150 °C, and ion source temperature was 230 °C. Identification of the individual oil components was performed by comparison of retention times and mass spectral data with those of literature data (23, 24) and the Wiley 275.L library (25, 26).

Insect rearing

T. castaneum adults were cultured on food medium composed of maize and wheat flour. The colony was reared in plastic jars at 26 °C and 60% humidity in the dark. All experiments were carried out in a climate chamber under the same laboratory conditions.

Bioassay of fumigant activity

The fumigant effect of the three essential oils of Artemisia species and their combinations was evaluated against adults of T. castaneum. Whatman filter paper no. 1 circular discs (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) were cut to 3 cm and placed in the underside of the lid of a 40-mL glass vial, which contained a group of 10 insects. Paper discs attached to the inside top of the container lid were impregnated with different doses of essential oil (25, 50, 100 and 200 μL/L) and vials were quickly closed. The fumigation test was carried out at 26 °C, with five replications. Percentage of mortality was determined 24 h after the treatment. The fumigation test was divided into two bioassays: the first one was performed at various volume fractions of the oils tested individually and the second one was used to evaluate the synergism/antagonism among the three species of Artemisia. For this, different mixtures of essential oils were prepared in the same proportion, named AB, AC, BC and ABC, where A is the essential oil of A. absinthium, B is the essential oil of A. campestris and C the essential oil of A. herba-alba. The joint action of essential oil mixture was determined on the basis of probit analysis (27). The toxicity indices of different essential oils were lethal volume fractions causing 50 and 95% mortality of exposed insects (LC50 and LC95). For the toxicity determination of essential oil mixtures, we used the synergistic ratio (SR) model (28):SR=LC50(essential oil alone)/LC50(mixture) /1/where SR is 1 for additive effect, SR<1 for antagonistic effect and SR>1 for synergistic effect.

Bioassay for repellency activity

Repellency degrees of the phytochemicals against T. castaneum were evaluated using some modifications of the area preference method (29). Essential oils in different doses were applied on 9-cm Whatman filter paper no. 1 circular discs cut in half. Tested solutions were adjusted by a dilution of 1, 2, 4 and 8 µL of each essential oil in 1 mL of acetone providing corresponding concentrations of 0.03, 0.06, 0.12 and 0.25 µL/cm2. A volume of 0.5 mL of each essential oil solution was applied uniformly to a half filter paper and the second half was soaked with 0.5 mL of acetone using a micropipette (single-channel mechanical micropipette (1000 μL, model DG1120; Labomoderne, Paris, France). All filter papers and control were dried for 15 min. Twenty unsexed adults aged seven days were placed at the centre of the filter paper disc and the number of insects on each half paper was counted after 2 h of exposure. Three replicates were set for each treatment. Percentage repellency (PR) after 2 h of exposure was calculated according to the formula:PR=[(Nc-Nt)/(Nc+Nt)]·100 /2/where Nc and Nt were the number of insects in the negative control half and in the treated half, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, v. 20.0 (30). Duncan’s multirange test was used to assess the comparison between the mean values at p<0.05. The correction using Abbott’s formula (31) was applied to correct mortality data for control response. Data from all replicates were used in probit analysis (27) to calculate LC50 and LC95. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the interdependence between Artemisia species and their chemical constituents.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our data indicate that essential oil yields varied within Artemisia species. The highest yield (in %) was recorded in leaves of A. campestris (0.31%) compared to that of A. herba-alba (0.27%) and A. absinthium (0.16%); data not shown. In total, 48, 72 and 51 components were identified representing 100, 99.91 and 95.54% A. absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba oil, respectively (Table 1). Common major compounds in all oils (in %) were: camphor 31.3, β-pinene 14.9, γ-terpinene 14.06 and germacrene 12.15, whereas the major components of A. absinthium essential oil (in %) were: camphor 24.81, chamazulene 13.71, bornyl acetate 5.89 and myrcene 5.83; however, A. campestris essential oil was characterized by (in %): β-pinene 14.49, germacrene 7.15 and trans-β-ocimene 6.78 as major components. The dominant components detected in A. herba-alba essential oil were (in %): β-thujone 12.5, α-thujone 8.78, sabinyl acetate 8.56 and terpinene-4-ol 8.51. The type and proportion of various monoterpenoids in the oil are characteristic of the genus and species. The composition of essential oils obtained from the tested Artemisia species in the current investigation showed a significant similarity to previous reports (32-37): the major component of the Tunisian A. absinthium was chamazulene, thujones are similar components from the essential oil of A. herba-alba and β-pinene was found in A. campestris collected from different geographic localities of Tunisia (33-35). Moreover, our results were in accordance with those of Riahi et al. (38) who found that the main components of A. absinthium in the semi-arid areas of Tunisia were camphor, chamazulene and bornyl acetate. To evaluate the chemotaxonomic significance of the essential oils of the three Artemisia species, a total number of 40 components whose total abundance is more than 1% were classified in 13 chemical families (Table 1), which were processed with PCA.

Identified volatile constituents of the essential oils of areal parts of Artemisia absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba from Tunisia

Compound RI w(compound)/%
A. absinthium (47) A. campestris (67) A. herba-alba (50) Total
Compounds whose total abundance is greater than 1
Acyclic monoterpenoids
Myrcene 7.63 5.83 2.84 0.46 9.13
trans-β-Ocimene 8.81 - 6.78 - 6.78
Linalool 10.07 3.53 - - 3.53
Bicyclic monoterpenoids
α-Pinene 6.37 3.02 3.94 0.64 7.6
Sabinene 7.24 0.27 - 1.03 1.3
trans-Sabinene hydrate 9.37 1.52 - 0.41 1.93
Trimethylnaphtalene 20.03 3.23 - - 3.23
β-Pinene 7.32 0.19 14.49 0.22 14.9
β-Thujone 10.26 - 5.73 12.5 18.23
α-Thujone 10.49 - 4.15 8.78 12.93
Camphor 11.13 24.81 1.77 4.52 31.3
Borneol 11.55 0.26 0.68 1.89 2.83
Bornyl acetate 13.97 5.89 0.67 0.78 7.34
Bicycloheptanes
Camphene 6.69 3.74 0.81 1.79 6.34
Cumenes
o-Cymene 8.39 0.57 3.09 3.8 7.46
Cycloalkenes
Trimethyl-dihydrocyclopropainden-6(6a)-one 20.64 3.12 - - 3.12
Ketones
Chrysanthenone 10.64 - 0.62 2.68 3.3
2-Undecanone 14.06 1.27 - - 1.27
Menthane monoterpenoids
α-Terpinene 8.2 2.09 0.89 3.35 6.33
Limonene 8.48 1.16 5.56 - 6.72
γ-Terpinene 9.15 3.59 5.65 4.82 14.06
α-Terpinolene 9.81 0.67 0.72 1.43 2.82
p-Menth-2-en-1-ol 10.58 0.27 0.31 1.49 2.07
1-4-Terpineol 11.78 4.97 - - 4.97
Terpinene-4-ol 11.90 - - 8.51 8.51
α-Terpineol 12.06 0.33 1.46 0.74 2.53
Sabinyl acetate 14.15 - 2.33 8.56 10.89
Benzenoids
Dimethyl ethyl benzene 13.5 - - 3.93 3.93
Monocyclic monoterpenes
Piperitol 12.30 - - 1.11 1.11
Naphthalenes
Trimethyldihydronaphthalene 18.25 1.03 - - 1.03
Trimethylnaphtalene 20.45 5.09 - - 5.09
Oxanes
1,8-Cineole 8.55 0.31 2.24 5.45 8
Oxolanes
Davana ether 17.79 - 0.45 2.09 2.54
cis-Davanone 19.45 - - 2.12 2.12
Sesquiterpenoids
Germacrene 17.73 1.53 7.15 3.47 12.15
Bicyclogermacrene 17.98 - 2.58 2.1 4.68
Spathulenol 19.4 - 2.33 - 2.33
∆-Cadinene 20.43 - 1.07 - 1.07
β-Eudesmol 20.62 - 3.42 - 3.42
Chamazulene 21.47 13.71 - - 13.71
Compounds whose total abundance is less than 1
Terpinolene 5.79 - 0.16 0.09 0.25
Tricyclene 6.11 0.12 0.25 0.11 0.48
α-Thujene 6.21 0.43 0.15 0.23 0.81
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 7.55 0.23 - - 0.23
α-Phellandrene 7.93 0.45 0.09 0.19 0.73
2-Nonanone 9.87 0.53 - - 0.53
Butanoic acid 10.12 0.56 - - 0.56
Filifolone 10.16 - 0.33 - 0.33
1,3,8-para-Menthatriene 10.36 - - 0.19 0.19
(e)-4,8-Dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene 10.42 - 0.27 - 0.27
Cycloheptane,1,3,6-trimethylene 10.86 - 0.1 - 0.1
α-Phellandrene epoxide 10.98 - 0.61 - 0.61
γ-Terpinene 10.98 0.18 - - 0.18
Menthone 11.26 - 0.08 - 0.08
trans-Chrysanthemal 11.36 - - 0.19 0.19
Pinocarvone 11.46 - 0.21 - 0.21
3-Nopinenone 11.48 - - 0.62 0.62
Myrcenol 11.93 0.53 - - 0.53
Myrtenal 12.17 - 0.18 - 0.18
Verbenone 12.46 - 0.13 - 0.13
Citronellol 12.78 - 0.17 - 0.17
2-Methylheptyl acetate 12.9 0.8 - - 0.8
Cuminaldehyde 13.06 - 0.17 - 0.17
Citronellyl formate 13.1 - 0.25 - 0.25
Chrystanthenyl acetate 13.46 - 0.6 - 0.6
Perilla aldehyde 13.77 0.17 - - 0.17
Phenol,2-ethyl-4,5-dimethyl 14.37 - - 0.06 0.06
α-Coapene 15.74 - 0.3 - 0.3
Nerylacetate 15.78 - 0.22 0.22
cis-Jasmone 16.16 - - 0.37 0.37
Methyl eugenol 16.21 0.16 - - 0.16
β-Caryophyllene 16.58 0.71 0.74 0.48 1.93
α-Dodecylene 16.65 0.2 - - 0.2
trans-β-Fanesene 17.14 - 0.17 - 0.17
α-Humulene 17.2 - 0.18 - 0.18
Ethyl cinnamate 17.37 - 0.26 0.52 0.78
α-Ylangene 17.61 - 0.51 - 0.51
(E,E)-α-Farnesene 18.05 - 0.66 - 0.66
α-Amorphene 18.26 - 0.34 - 0.34
Methylpatchenol 18.95 - 0.18 - 0.18
Nerolidol 19.03 - 0.51 0.51
Farnesol 19.03 - - 0.28 0.28
Citronnellylpropanoate 19.18 - 0.31 - 0.31
Caryophyllene oxide 19.49 0.16 - - 0.16
Alloaromadendrene 19.5 - 0.92 - 0.92
(-)-Caryophullene oxide 19.5 - - 0.52 0.52
γ-Gurjunene 19.66 - 0.41 - 0.41
Viridiflorol 19.66 - - 0.17 0.17
Geranyl isovalerate 19.73 0.13 0.77 - 0.9
Bicyclo (5,5,2) nonane-4,8,8-trimethyl-2-methylene 19.95 - 0.5 - 0.5
β-Maaliene 20.1 - 0.68 - 0.68
β-Myrcene 20.14 - 0.28 0.28
Diethyl-dimethyl-tricyclo-hexane 20.19 0.27 - - 0.27
β-Cadinene 20.27 - 0.43 - 0.43
Isospathulenol 20.38 - 0.29 0.29
(2S,5E)-Caryophyll-5-en-12-al 20.45 0.6 - - 0.6
α-Amorphene 20.5 - 0.39 - 0.39
1,2-Dimethyl-4-methylene-3-phenyl-cyclopentene 20.58 0.25 - - 0.25
T-Muurolol 20.65 - - 0.4 0.4
Ethanone 20.88 - - 0.42 0.42
Calamenene 21.17 - 0.67 - 0.67
γ-trans-aeaqui-Cyclocitral 21.17 - - 0.36 0.36
(8)Paracyclophane-2,4-diene 21.18 0.51 - - 0.51
Geranyl butyrate 21.23 - 0.28 - 0.28
Mintsulfide 22 - 0.17 - 0.17
N-Methylsuccinimide 23.43 - 0.22 - 0.22
Palmiticacid 25.09 - - 0.34 0.34
2,4-Dimethylfuran 25.48 0.22 - - 0.22
Bromoacetonitrile 25.79 0.99 - - 0.99
Phytol 27.1 - 0.25 0.26 0.51
2-Acetyl-4-(2,5-dichlorophenyl) furan 30.13 - 0.17 - 0.17

Number in the brackets next to the plant name indicates the total number of identified compounds in its oil, RI=retention index

Among the 13 chemical families investigated from the three Artemisia species, the most abundant were bicyclic monoterpenes, followed by menthane monoterpenoids, sesquiterpenoids, acyclic monoterpenoids and the least abundant chemicals were monocyclic monoterpenoids (Fig. 1). It is important to note the absence of oxolanes, benzenoids and monocyclic monoterpenes from A. absinthium. Naphthalenes, benzenoids, cycloalkenes and monocyclic monoterpenes were not identified in A. campestris while A. herba-alba did not contain naphthalenes and cycloalkenes.

Chemical families and relative contents of essential oils from Artemisia absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba


The results of PCA for Artemisia species are shown in Fig. 2. Based on this analysis, a higher variability within the essential oils of Artemisia species is observed. First PCA axis explained 75.8% of the total variance whereas the second axis revealed 24.1% of the total variance (Fig. 2). The first principal component separates bicyclic monoterpenes, sesquiterpenoids, acyclic monoterpenoids, naphthalenes, bicycloheptanes and cycloalkenes from menthane monoterpenoids, oxanes, oxolanes, cumenes, benzenoids, ketones and monocyclic monoterpenes. The second principal component distinguishes sesquiterpenoids, acyclic monoterpenoids, oxanes and cumenes from the other compounds.

Principal component analysis of 13 major chemical families in essential oils of three Artemisia species


Menthane monoterpenoids, oxanes, oxolanes, cumenes, benzenoids, ketones and monocyclic monoterpenes distinctly overlap in a separate group in the PCA, represented by A. herba-alba. The other groups overlap and are divided into two subgroups; the first one is represented by sesquiterpenoids and acyclic monoterpenoids, and is related to A. campestris. The second one is made of sesquiterpenoids, acyclic monoterpenoids, bicyclic monoterpenes, naphthalenes, bicycloheptanes and cycloalkenes, and is related to A. absinthium. These findings are in agreement with those cited by Dib et al. (39) indicating that A. campestris collected from four different localities in Southern Tunisia contains a high level of sesquiterpenes.

The results of fumigation bioassay are shown in Fig. 3. At the two lowest volume fractions, the three Artemisia sp. did not show statistical differences. At 100 μL/L, essential oil from A. herba-alba was more toxic than the other two Artemisia sp. after 24 h of exposure. At the highest volume fraction (200 μL/L), all three Artemisia sp. reached the highest toxic effect. The fumigant toxicity test showed that A. herba-alba was more toxic than the other two Artemisia species. These results were confirmed by LC50 values shown in Table 2. In a fumigant test, a dosage of 142.8 μL/L of A. herba-alba was sufficient to kill 50% of insects after 24 h of treatment, followed by A. absinthium and A. campestris with LC50 of 147.6 and 151.3 μL/L respectively. These results show clearly the effectiveness of A. herba-alba in comparison with the other two Artemisia species. In a previous study of Titouhi et al. (35) A. herba-alba exhibited the best insecticidal effect against the two stored grain insects, Callosobruchus maculatus and Bruchus rufimanus, with LC50 of 7.7 and 8.3 μL/L, respectively.

Percentage of mortality of Tribolium castaneum after 24 h of exposure to various volume fractions of Artemisia absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba essential oils


Median lethal dose (LC50) and 95% mortality (LC95) values of fumigant bioassay with Artemisia absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba essential oils after 24 h

Artemisia oil N Slope±SE LC50/
(µL/L)
LC95/(µL/L) χ 2 df
A. absinthium 200 (0.16±0.01) 147.6 262.7 13.67 2
A. campestris 200 (0.14±0.01) 151.3 289.7 9.81 2
A. herba-alba 200 (0.13±0.01) 142.8 304.6 42.39 2

N=number of tested insects, SE=standard error of mean, χ2=Pearson chi-square value, df=degrees of freedom

Aromatic plants contain essential oils that are a complex mixture of acyclic and/or cyclic monoterpenoids used in perfume, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. Application of essential oils to manage insects and diseases in agriculture is the recently emerging trend (40). Monoterpenoids have a promising role in pest control due to their acute toxicity to insects and their repellent (41) and antifeedant potency (42). Moreover, among monoterpenes, ketones have higher insecticidal effect than alcohols or hydrocarbons (43-46) and even among ketones, toxicity may be of varying degrees (47, 48). The main cause of this variation may be due to either geographical or physicochemical characteristics (49). Numerous studies have shown the high toxicity of ketones against some stored pests like Sitophilus in fumigant and contact assays (44, 47, 50). These results show that among the three Artemisia oils, the one from A. herba-alba has the best effect (LC50=142.8 μL/L). Such finding suggests that the presence of ketone groups increases toxicity since A. herba-alba contains the highest mass fraction (58.64%) of ketones (chrysanthenone and 2-undecanone). Other studies revealed insecticidal and repellent effect of terpenes on several stored grain pests, with a much more pronounced effect of ketone (48, 51). Moreover, A. herba-alba contains more menthane monoterpenoids, among them terpinen-4-ol, which was present only in this species. According to Chu et al. (52) terpinen-4-ol has insecticidal activity against Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky). Other researchers reported the effective contact toxicity of A. herba-alba against Tribolium castaneum (18).

In the interest of the improvement of the effectiveness of essential oil as pest management method, combined activities were examined to analyse interactions among the three essential oils. The joint effects of the three oils were assessed by mixtures adjusted at a ratio of 1:1 for binary mixtures and 1:1:1 for tertiary mixtures against Tribolium castaneum adults. In the present study, combinations of Artemisia essential oils exhibited lower insecticidal activity than single oils. The activity did not exceed 60% of mortality at the highest volume fraction (200 μL/L). Fig. 4 shows that there are no statistical differences among the four combinations tested at four volume fractions, although the toxic effect of all the tested combinations at the highest volume fraction was relatively higher.

Percentage of mortality of Tribolium castaneum exposed to various volume fractions of combinations of Artemisia absinthium (A), A. campestris (B) and A. herba-alba (C) essential oils after 24 h of exposure


The synergistic ratio (SR) shows antagonistic effects of all mixtures (Table 3), which indicates that oils tested alone have the most toxic effect. It has been known that mixtures of compounds increase the insecticidal effect, because insect sensitivity differs from one compound to another (53). In our study, the combination of the three essential oils had antagonist effect, showing that the combined application led to the decrease in insecticidal activity. In agreement with our results, Benelli et al. (54) showed antagonistic insecticidal activity of binary mixtures of Satureja montana and Pinus nigra essential oils against Culex quinquefasciatus. These findings show the importance of testing combined effects of essential oils used as control tools against pests, because positive or negative interactions between major components of the essential oil (alcoholic, phenolic, terpenic or ketonic compounds), minor components and biological activities can occur.

Synergistic ratio (SR) of three combined Artemisia sp. essential oils against Tribolium castaneum adults after 24 h of exposure

Artemisia oil Combined oils Combined LC50/(µL/L) Synergistic ratio (SR) Effect
A.
absinthium (A)
A
A+B
A+C
A+B+C
147.6
195.8
192.4
221.3
0.75
0.76
0.66
Antagonism
Antagonism
Antagonism
A.
campestris (B)
B
B+A
B+C
B+A+C
151.3
195.8
221.8
221.3
0.77
0.68
0.68
Antagonism
Antagonism
Antagonism
A.
herba-alba (C)
C
C+A
C+B
C+A+B
142.8
192.4
221.8
221.3
0.74
0.64
0.64
Antagonism
Antagonism
Antagonism

LC50=median lethal dose

The results of the repellency test of the essential oils from three Artemisia species against Tribolium castaneum are shown in Table 4. It was found that the three samples exhibited obvious repellent activity towards T. castaneum. There were significant differences in repellency among the tested oils (p<0.05). Both A. absinthium and A. herba-alba oils provided ≥80% protection for 1 h against T. castaneum at 0.08 µL/cm2. After 2 h of exposure, A. absinthium and A. campestris oils showed the highest repellent activity against T. castaneum adults at the same dose. Among the three essential oils, A. absinthium repelled rapidly and strongly at all tested exposure times, while A. herba-alba showed highest repellency by the first hour and its effect declined with prolonged exposure time. Contrary, A. campestris exerted its highest effect by the second hour of exposure. A. absinthium also showed quite promising insecticidal activity with LC95 of 262.7 μL/L. In terms of repellency, it exhibited the highest effect at 0.08 µL/cm2 after 1 and 2 h of exposure. The chemical analysis shows that this species contains more bicyclic monoterpenes, bicycloheptanes, cycloalkenes and naphthalenes than the two other Artemisia sp. The above data show that fumigant and repellent activities of A. campestris are the weakest. The results of the repellency bioassay are in agreement with those reported by Jemâa (55) in that a higher repellency was recorded with A. absinthium essential oil than with A. herba-alba against both stored insects, T. castaneum and Oryzaephilus surinamensis. Moreover, previous study has demonstrated the repellent activity of A. absinthium oil against Phthorimaea operculella (56). Lower or higher amounts of bioactive ingredients in essential oil may be responsible for reducing the insect repellency and toxicity. In this context, our study shows that A. campestris essential oil is richer in sesquiterpenoids than the other two Artemisia species.

Repellent activity of Artemisia absinthium, A. campestris and A. herba-alba essential oils on Tribolium castaneum adults after different exposure times using the filter paper test

t(exposure)/h Dose/(μL/cm2) Repellent activity/%
A. absinthium A. campestris A. herba-alba
1 0.01 (36.6±3.3)abc (56.6±8.8)abc (20.0±15.2)ab
0.02 (63.3±6.6)bc (43.3±27.2)abc (43.3±8.8)abc
0.04 (83.3±6.6)c (76.3±14.4)bc (70.0±11.5)bc
0.08 (90.0±5.7)c (70.0±5.7)bc (80.0±5.7)c
2 0.01 (40.0±5.7)abc (76.6±3.3)bc (6.66±18.5)a
0.02 (56.6±12)abc (60.0±11.5)bc (40.0±5.7)abc
0.04 (60.0±5.7)bc (73.3±14.5)bc (73.3±6.6)bc
0.08 (90.0±5.7)c (83.3±8.8)c (63.3±12.0)bc

Data are presented as mean value±standard deviation, mean values with different letters in superscript are statistically different (p<0.05)

CONCLUSION

Artemisia essential oils showed promising effect in protecting the stored grains from Tribolium castaneum attacks. However, the effect varied significantly depending on species and chemical composition of each oil. In general, the strong insecticidal activity of A. herba-alba was associated with a high content of menthane monoterpenoids, whereas A. absinthium exhibited the highest repellent activity, based on its richness of bicyclic monoterpenes. Moreover, we observed that the combination of essential oils did not improve their insecticidal effect. Consequently, chemical composition affects the effectiveness of the desired essential oil or their mixtures. The above findings suggest that A. absinthium and A. herba-alba oils have a potential to be used separately as alternatives to chemical fumigants in the protection of stored cereals. A. herba-alba causes mortality of more than 60% of insect population at volume fraction of 200 µL/L within 24 h and A. absinthium repel 90% of insects at the dose of 0.08 μL/cm2 after 2 h of exposure. The oils from these plant species may have an interesting potential as natural repellents and insecticides considering their noticeable effects at low applied volume fractions and short times of exposure. However, the evaluation of these activities under industrial conditions is mandatory to prove their practicable application.

REFERENCES
  1. Haque M, Nakakita H, Ikenaga H, Sota N. Development-inhibiting activity of some tropical plants against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res. 2000;36(3):281-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(99)00048-X, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/10758266
  2. Yildirim E, Ozbek H, Aslan I. Pests of stored products. Erzurum, Turkey: Ataturk University Agricultural Faculty Press No. 191; 2001. p. 117.
  3. Bond EJ. Manual of fumigation for insect control. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 1984. pp. 298-306. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/X5042E/x5042E00.htm.
  4. Fields P, White N. Alternatives to methyl bromide treatments for stored-product and quarantine insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:331-59, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145217, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/11729078
  5. Van Someren Graven JE. Guide to fumigation under gas-proof sheets. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2004. Available from: www.fao.org/3/a-AU098e.pdf.
  6. Langenheim J. Higher plant terpenoids: A phytocentric overview of their ecological roles. J Chem Ecol. 1994;20(6):1223-80, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059809, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/24242340
  7. Kovač J, Gavarić N, Bucar F, Smole Možina S. Antimicrobial and resistance modulatory activity of Alpinia katsumadai seed extract, essential oil and post-distillation extract. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2014;52(2):248-54
  8. Tural S, Turhan S. Properties and antioxidant capacity of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicholus) by-product protein films containing thyme essential oil. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2017;55(1):77-85, https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.55.01.17.4824, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28559736
  9. Pilevar Z, Hosseini H, Hajimehdipoor H, Shahraz F, Alizadeh L, Mousavi Khaneghah A. The anti-Staphylococcus aureus effect of combined Echinophora platyloba essential oil and liquid smoke in beef. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2017;55(1):117-24, https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.55.01.17.4633, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28559740
  10. Isman MB, Machial CM. Pesticides based on plant essential oils: From traditional practice to commercialization. In: Rai M, Carpinella MC, editors. Naturally occurring bioactive compounds. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier B.V.; 2006. pp. 29-44.
  11. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils – A review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(2):446-75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/17996351
  12. The strategy of integrated mite management. In: Hoy MA, editor. Agricultural Acarology: Introduction to Integrated Mite Management. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC, Taylor & Francis Group; 2011. p. 61.
  13. Regnault-Roger C. Essential oils in insect control. In: Ramawat KG, Mérillon JM, editors. Natural products. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2013. pp. 4087-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22144-6_181, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22144-6_181
  14. Pellicer J, Garnatje T, Vallès J. Artemisia (Asteraceae): Understanding its evolution using cytogenetic and molecular systematic tools, with emphasis on subgenus Dracunculus. In: Muñoz-Torrero D, editor. Recent advances in pharmaceutical sciences. Trivandrum, Kerala, India: Transworld Research Network; 2011. pp. 199-222.
  15. Vallès J, Torrell M, Garnatje T, Garcia-Jacas N, Vilatersana R, Susanna A. The genus Artemisia and its allies: Phylogeny of the subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae, Anthemideae) based on nucleotide sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS). Plant Biol. 2003;5(3):274-84, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-40790
  16. Cultivation of aromatic and medicinal plants. Tunis, Tunisia: Agricultural Investment Promotion Agency (APIA); 2003. pp. 120-32.
  17. Mighri H, Hajlaoui H, Akrout A, Najjaa H, Neffati M. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Artemisia herba-alba essential oil cultivated in Tunisian arid zone. C R Chim. 2010;13(3):380-6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2009.09.008
  18. Bachrouch O, Ferjani N, Haouel S, Mediouni BenJemâa J. Major compounds and insecticidal activities of two Tunisian Artemisia essential oils toward two major coleopteran pests. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;65:127-33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.007
  19. Lopes-Lutz D, Alviano D, Alviano C, Kolodziejczyk P. Screening of chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Artemisia essential oils. Phytochemistry. 2008;69(8):1732-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.02.014, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/18417176
  20. Chiasson H, Bélanger A, Bostanian N, Vincent C, Poliquin A. Acaricidal properties of Artemisia absinthium and Tanacetum vulgare (Asteraceae) essential oils obtained by three methods of extraction. J Econ Entomol. 2001;94(1):167-71, https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-94.1.167, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/11233109
  21. Joshi R. Volatile composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Artemisia absinthium growing in Western Ghats region of North West Karnataka, India. Pharm Biol. 2013;51(7):888-92, https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.768676, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/23570523
  22. Al-Snafi A. The pharmacological importance of Artemisia campestris – A review. Asian J Pharm Res.. 2015;5(2):88-92
  23. Kováts E. Characterization of organic compounds by gas chromatography. Part 1: Retention indices of aliphatic halides, alcohols, aldehydes and ketones. Helv Chim Acta. 1958;41(7):1915-32, https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19580410703
  24. Shibamoto T. Retention indices in essential oil analysis. In: Sandra P, Bicchi C, editors. Capillary gas chromatography in essential oil analysis. Heidelberg, Germany: Hüthig; 1987. pp. 259-74.
  25. Adams R. Identification of essential oils by ion trap mass spectroscopy. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, Inc.; 1989.
  26. McLafferty FW, Stauffer DB, editors. Wiley/NBS registry of mass spectral data, volumes 1-7. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons; 1989.
  27. Finney DJ. Probit analysis. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1971. p. 318.
  28. Hewlett P, Plackett R. A unified theory for quantal responses to mixtures of drugs: Non-interactive action. Biometrics. 1959;15(4):591-610, https://doi.org/10.2307/2527657
  29. McDonald LL, Guy RH, Speirs RD. Preliminary evaluation of new candidate materials as toxicants, repellents, and attractants against stored-product insects. In: USDA Marketing Research Report No. 882. Whashington, DC, USA: Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture; 1970.
  30. Ho R, editor. Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
  31. Abbott W. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18(2):265-7, https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/18.2.265a
  32. Msaada K, Salem N, Bachrouch O, Bousselmi S, Tammar S, Alfaify A. Chemical composition and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) essential oils and phenolics. J Chem. 2015;2015:804658, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/804658
  33. Haouari M, Ferchichi A. Essential oil composition of Artemisia herba-alba from Southern Tunisia. Molecules. 2009;14(4):1585-94, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14041585, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/19384287
  34. Neffati A, Skandrani I, BenSghaier M, Bouhlel I, Kilani S, Ghedira K. Chemical composition, mutagenic and antimutagenic activities of essential oils from (Tunisian) Artemisia campestris and Artemisia herba-alba. J Essent Oil Res. 2008;20(5):471-7, https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2008.9700061
  35. Titouhi F, Amri M, Messaoud C, Haouel S, Youssfi S, Cherif A. Protective effects of three Artemisia essential oils against Callosobruchus maculatus and Bruchus rufimanus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the extended side-effects on their natural enemies. J Stored Prod Res. 2017;72:11-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.02.007
  36. Younsi F, Trimech R, Boulila A, Ezzine O, Dhahri S, Boussaid M. Essential oil and phenolic compounds of Artemisia herba-alba (Asso.): Composition, antioxidant, antiacetylcholinesterase, and antibacterial activities. Int J Food Prop. 2016;19(7):1425-38, https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015.1079789
  37. Bellili S, Jazi S, Hrira M, Lamari A, Dhifi W, Diouani M. Phytochemical identification of volatile fraction, essential oil and screening of antioxidant, antibacterial, allelopathic and insecticidal potential from Artemisia herba-alba leaves. Main Group Chem. 2017;16(2):95-109, https://doi.org/10.3233/MGC-170229
  38. Riahi L, Chograni H, Elferchichi M, Zaouali Y, Zoghlami N, Mliki A. Variations in Tunisian wormwood essential oil profiles and phenolic contents between leaves and flowers and their effects on antioxidant activities. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;46:290-6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.01.036
  39. Dib I, Angenot L, Mihamou A, Ziyyat A, Tits M. Artemisia campestris L.: Ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological review. J Herb Med. 2017;7:1-10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2016.10.005
  40. Singh G. Pest control through essential oil. In: Handa SS, Kaul MK, editors. Supplement to cultivation and utilization of aromatic plants. Regional Research Laboratory, Jammu-Tawi. Jammu-Tawi, India: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Jammu-Tawi; 1997. pp. 49-62.
  41. Watanabe K, Shono Y, Kakimizu A, Okada A, Matsuo N, Satoh A. New mosquito repellent from Eucalyptus camaldulensis. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41(11):2164-6, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00035a065
  42. Hough-Goldstein J. Antifeedant effects of common herbs on the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ Entomol. 1990;19(2):234-8, https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/19.2.234
  43. Abdelgaleil S, Mohamed M, Badawy M, El-Arami S. Fumigant and contact toxicities of monoterpenes to Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and their inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase activity. J Chem Ecol. 2009;35(5):518-25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9635-3, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/19412756
  44. Lee S, Peterson C, Coats J. Fumigation toxicity of monoterpenoids to several stored product insects. J Stored Prod Res. 2003;39(1):77-85, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(02)00020-6
  45. Chaubey M. Fumigant toxicity of essential oils and pure compounds against Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biol Agric Hortic. 2012;28(2):111-9, https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2012.681352
  46. Yildirim E, Emsen B, Kordali S. Insecticidal effects of monoterpenes on Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Appl Bot Food Qual. 2013;86:198-204, https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2013.086.027
  47. Germinara G, De Cristofaro A, Rotundo G. Bioactivity of short-chain aliphatic ketones against adults of the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.). Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68(3):371-7, https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2272, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/22081494
  48. Herrera J, Zunino M, Dambolena J, Pizzolitto R, Gañan N, Lucini E. Terpene ketones as natural insecticides against Sitophilus zeamais. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;70:435-42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.074
  49. Grodnitzky J, Coats J. QSAR evaluation of monoterpenoids’ insecticidal activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(16):4576-80, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0201475, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/12137478
  50. Tripathi A, Prajapati V, Kumar S. Bioactivity of l-carvone, d-carvone and dihydrocarvone towards three stored product beetles. J Econ Entomol. 2003;96(5):1594-601, https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.5.1594, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/14650536
  51. Herrera J, Zunino M, Massuh Y, Pizzollito R, Dambolena J, Gañan N. Fumigant toxicity from five essential oils rich in ketones against Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky). Agriscientia. 2014;31(1):35-41
  52. Chu S, Liu Z, Du S, Deng Z. Chemical composition and insecticidal activity against Sitophilus zeamais of the essential oils derived from Artemisia giraldii and Artemisia subdigitata. Molecules. 2012;17(6):7255-65, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17067255, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/22695231
  53. Singh R, Koul O, Rup P, Jindal J. Toxicity of some essential oil constituents and their binary mixtures against Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2009;29(2):93-101, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758409990087
  54. Benelli G, Pavela R, Canale A, Cianfaglione K, Ciaschetti G, Conti F. Acute larvicidal toxicity of five essential oils (Pinus nigra, Hyssopus officinalis, Satureja montana, Aloysia citrodora and Pelargonium graveolens) against the filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus: Synergistic and antagonistic effects. Parasitol Int. 2017;66(2):166-71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2017.01.012, PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24377856/28110082
  55. Jemâa J. Essential oil as a source of bioactive constituents for the control of insect pests of economic importance in Tunisia. Med Aromat Plants. 2014;3(2):158, https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0412.1000158
  56. Naghizadeh S, Rafiee-Dastjerdi H, Golizadeh A, Esmaielpour B, Mahdavi V. The effects of essential oils of Artemisia absinthium L., Achillea millefolium L. and Artemisia dracunculus L. against potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). JJAS. 2016;12(4):1115-23, https://doi.org/10.12816/0035072